Unless there is an outbreak at a school, it makes no sense to keep anyone out. Pretty sure parents of fragile children, will keep their children out if they fear for their child’s safety in the school setting, whether the unvaxed are excluded from school or not. Because, shed and spread and vaccine failure. And, why are diseases which are not transmissible in the school setting required for attendance, like tetanus, Hep B and HPV among others???? Why is simply getting the required schedule enough? Why not titer checks to prove immunity? One small group of aware parents, either by experience or by critical thinking and the government seeks to remove the religious and conscience rights to keep them in line, rather than trying to fix the actual problem so that people can be confident that their choice to protect against a disease does not result a lifetime of chronic disease? This is wrong on so many levels and any rational critical thinking person with any understanding of the founding principles of this country would see it. Protecting pharma means socially engineering people to believe they are protecting the herd in the name of better public health through a captured government regulatory system and bought medical associations, legislators and media. It was truly a long game and we are in the final seconds….. and it is not just about bragging rights, but who owns your immune system.


YESTERDAY IN OREGON, I gave testimony, registered as neither for nor against, to educate the Ways and Means Committee on scientific facts relevant one of the most draconian bills conceived (HB3063). Oregon has classically been among the most politically diverse and yet tolerant society among all of the US States. The aim of the bill is to remove religious and personal exemptions recognized by the State for school attendance after a handful of measles cases, many in adults. The argument in support of the bill is that immunocompromised kids attending school might become infected with measles, mumps, pertussis, or any of the other allegedly “vaccine preventable diseases”.

The religious exemption removal is breathtaking in its scope, and will likely be found to be unconstitutional if passed. Clearly, if the medical community fails to attribute vaccine adverse events to the vaccine, the law will prevent parents from exercising a…

View original post 1,076 more words

6 months to catch up an unvaccinated child…. with a schedule that has never been tested for safety and is not even recommended by the CDC. WHAT IS GOING ON??????

Forbes Fulminates

Among the 8.6 million people who live in New York City, there’s been 359 cases of measles since last September. On March 9, Mayor Bill de Blasio leading the charge, the city mandated the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine in four densely populated zip codes in Brooklyn, neighborhoods where many Hasidic Jews reside. With 294 cases in Williamsburg, the outbreak has been centered in that community. (55 cases have hit another largely Hasidic community in Brooklyn, with ten cases elsewhere in the city.)

Should the city learn that an unvaccinated person in the crowded, insular community has been exposed to measles, they and their family have a matter of days to get the single MMR vaccine or pay a fine.

In Oregon, on the other hand, there’s been 10 cases of measles statewide in 2019 – six cases in the county that includes Portland, and four in the rest of…

View original post 5,895 more words

Posted by: Calilo | March 27, 2019

I have a Right to a Disease-Free World

I have a right to a disease-free world, but not clean air?

I have a right to a disease-free world, but not clean water?

I have a right to a disease-free world, but not clean food?

I have a right to a disease-free world, but not to a world free of electromagnetic pollution?

I have a right to a disease-free world, but not the right to decide what is injected into my body?

Only rights to that which makes corporations money?

No rights to that which takes corporations money?

I see what you did there…

Posted by: Calilo | March 26, 2019

Not Medically Accepted

Stonewalled…. if you can’t do the tests, you can’t make the case. If you can’t make the case, it does not exist.

Protect Your Right To a Healthy Life!

By, Sarah Dillingham

On Wednesday, February 27, 2019, Catie Clobes of Howard Lake, Minnesota brought her normal, healthy 6-month-old baby girl Evee Gayle Clobes to her well-baby checkup, whereupon the pediatrician declared her to be in “perfect health” with no problems or concerns. After Evee was examined by her pediatrician, the nurse administered the standard 6-month doses of Pertussis, Tetanus, Diphtheria, Hepatitis B, Polio, and Pneumococcal vaccines via Prevnar and Pediarix injections. On the evening of Thursday February 28th, Evee was unusually sleepy when Ms. Clobes put her to bed on her back, and checked her at approximately 11:00 p.m. On Friday March 1st at 7:00 a.m., Ms. Clobes discovered her daughter on her back, lifeless and not breathing, and called 911. Evee was rushed to Buffalo Hospital and pronounced dead on arrival.

The Anoka County Medical Examiner assured Ms. Clobes on the day of her daughter’s…

View original post 574 more words

Posted by: Calilo | February 6, 2019

Response to the Lancet paper

More pharma corruption… to the detriment of innocent seniors and others who have been conned into taking a drug that provides questionable benefit.

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick

3rd February 2019

A number of people have asked for my views on the Lancet Paper ‘Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomized controlled trials.’

It was reported in various major newspapers.

The Times reported the study thus: “Everyone over the age of 75 should be considered for cholesterol-lowering statins, experts have urged, after an analysis found up to 8,000 lives a year could be saved.”1  

The Telegraph had this to say. “Researchers said up to 8,000 deaths a year could be prevented if GPs simply prescribed drugs costing pennies a day.”

This comes hot on the heels of a concerted effort to silence statin critics around the world by a coalition of ‘experts. I suspect the coordinated timing is more than a coincidence.

‘The editors of more than two dozen cardiology-related scientific journals around the…

View original post 2,791 more words

100% vaccination without exemption equals maximum vaccine injury to the population. People once never heard of autism when it was 1 in 10,000. Now, at 1 in 36 everyone knows someone affected. What will that number be when 100% vaccination in children is reached. How about Alzheimers in adults when 100% vaccination in the older population is reached? What about early-onset alzheimers in the middle age population? All the other chronic health issues in every population after cradle-to-grave mandates? Yeah.


The California experiment of removing religious and  philosphical exemptions, and then bullying tactics to deny medical exemptions to mandatory vaccination laws is being replicated in States across the country.  These exemptions exist as rights that the people of individual states gave themselves.  Here are some reasons why stripping exemptions and leaving mandates without exemptions is a line too far.

#1. Many families need personal/philosophical exemptions to protect their families from vaccine injury. 

Medical professionals are willfully mislead by CDC, AAP and other organizations on the reality of vaccine injury.  As a scientist who has participated in over 100 research studies of myriad types, including neurodevelopment and immunology, I can say that the denial that vaccine cause both neurodevelopmental disorders and autoimmunity is paper thin.  Let me give you an example.  Researchers routinely induce human autoimmunity disorder in mice using aluminum hydroxide.  Very low doses are needed if a genetic…

View original post 795 more words

Posted by: Calilo | October 29, 2018

When Vaccine Refusal is Not Unethical

A deep look into how the truth about vaccines is obfuscated and how that does not serve the public interest, if the goal is the best health of the population. GREAT POST!!!!! Please help IPAK continue to shine a light on the vaccine travesty of the 21st century, by scientifically evaluating the issues at hand.


THERE IS AN ENTRENCHED HERD MENTALITY AND GROUPTHINK phenomenon on the issue of the morality of vaccination refusal by those who scratch the surface of the issue that requires a specific constellation of embedded arbitrary values that both are not founded on basic logic and that also run counter to the norms and mores of relative value systems as they apply to individual vs. societal rights. In all of my writings to date, I have explored many issues, from natural vs. artificial herd immunity to miscalculations on the dose toxicity of aluminum by the US FDA. I now will tackle the unscrutinized presumption made by the herd that vaccinating one’s child is necessary and therefore should be a mandated moral duty of every parent.

The Medically Ineligible

First, let’s recall that “every parent” is an induction, which we disallow as an unwarranted generalization. That is to say, there must…

View original post 2,453 more words

Posted by: Calilo | August 13, 2018

The Beginning of the End of Corporate Fascism in America

Probably some shredding parties going on in corporations across the globe…. you can run, you can shred, but WE KNOW and the WORLD WILL KNOW the corruption which places profits over people.


WHEN HISTORIANS REVIEW THE EARLY 21st Century, the will note that a seismic shift occurred in which the People of the United State of America stood up, all at once it seemed, in August 2018, and began tearing apart a decades-old system of corruption. “Corporate fascism” is a difficult concept for some to wrap their heads around, given the classic definitions of Fascism specifically being (courtesy Merriam-Webster:)

a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

Corporate fascism is best defined, courtesy yours truly, as

an economic and political movement that exalts profit and the corporation above the people of any nation and that typically uses corruption, regulatory capture, entanglements, incentives and intimidation of elected…

View original post 687 more words

Posted by: Calilo | July 30, 2018

What’s the demographic of non-vax parents?

1 out of 3 surveyed are conspiracy theorists based on the declaration by Government authorities that vaccines do not cause autism. I had no idea there were so many!

Levi Quackenboss

Screen Shot 2018-07-26 at 6.38.11 PM

{photo used with permission Pexels/Godisable Jacob}

I’m reviewing a friend’s new book and he wrote in a sentence that 24.3% of people who voted in the 2016 presidential election agree with the statement “Vaccines have been shown to cause autism.”

And I was like, what? Did I already know this in 2016 and I forgot? I do turn off my Facebook account for months at a time… maybe I missed this.

I went to the source, which was a YouGov poll you can see here, endearingly headlined “Belief in conspiracy theories largely depends on political identity.”

The breakdown is this: 18% of Clinton voters who answered the YouGov poll completely believe vaccines can cause autism. And 31% of all voters who took the poll completely believe vaccines can cause autism. What a strange, half-assed way to present that information, right? What about the Trump voters?

Then I went looking

View original post 411 more words

Show me the math that says a fully vaccinated population is healthier (defined including absence of chronic disease, rather than soley absense of infectious disease) than an unvaccinated or undervaccinated population. Because isn’t that the number we all what to know, that is that vaccine policy has led to a healthier population?

Older Posts »